Federal Reserve, the Economy and CD Rate Forecast - May 26, 2020

POSTED ON BY

Two weeks from now the next two-day FOMC meeting is scheduled to start. This will be the first meeting this year that should include an update to the Summary of Economic Projections (SEP). This had been planned for the March meeting, but after two emergency meetings, the Fed decided to skip the SEP update since the pandemic had caused too many future uncertainties for the SEP to be useful.

If the SEP update is provided at the June meeting, it should be very interesting. It will show the FOMC member projections on the important economic numbers. More interesting for savers will be the federal funds rate projections. Of course, these projections become meaningless when there are unexpected shocks to the economy. In the December SEP, no FOMC member forecasted the federal funds rate to drop in 2020. Even though you have to take the projections with a grain of salt, they will provide insights into the Fed’s expectations on the economic recovery and when a Fed rate hike might be a possibility. We’ll see if any FOMC member is forecasting rate hikes in 2021, 2022 and 2023.

Based on recent interviews and speeches by Fed Chair Jerome Powell, I wouldn’t be surprised if all the FOMC members anticipate the federal funds remaining at the zero bound through 2022. Fed Chair Powell’s testimony last week to the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs included some dire views of the economy such as this one:

Available economic data for the current quarter show a sharp drop in output and an equally sharp rise in unemployment. By these measures and many others, the scope and speed of this downturn are without modern precedent and are significantly worse than any recession since World War II.

It’s too early to know if the Fed’s current zero interest rate policy (ZIRP) will last longer than the period after the 2008 financial crisis. That lasted for seven years from December 2008 to December 2015. The second half of 2020 will be important. If we don’t start to see a strong recovery during this time, the odds of an extended ZIRP period increases.

Soon after the Fed cut rates to the zero bound on March 15th, the CME FedWatch Tool showed zero odds that the target federal funds rate was going to change at all future Fed meetings up through March 2021. It showed 100% odds that there would be no rate changes. At first I thought we may start seeing small odds for negative rates, but due to this “zero bound” assumption used by CME, the CME FedWatch Tool still shows no chance of negative rates in the future. Two weeks ago, there were media reports that the Fed Funds futures market was pricing in negative rates for next year. This may cause a change in the CME FedWatch Tool to accommodate negative rates, but so far, this hasn’t been done.

I had assumed that the 100% odds of no change would continue until the CME FedWatch Tool is changed to handle negative rates. However, three weeks ago, we started to see slight odds of a 25bp rate hike. Those odds went down this week. The odds are now under 1% for any rate hike through March 2021.

Even tiny odds of a rate hike this year don’t seem right. I wonder if this might be an artifact of the Tool not being able to handle negative rates. It sure seems that negative rates are more likely than the Fed deciding to hike rates this year. The Fed has made it clear that it plans to wait “until it is confident that the economy has weathered recent events” before deciding to hike rates. It’s possible that the markets are seeing at least a tiny possibility of rising inflation and/or a very strong economic recovery. Even in that scenario, I can’t see any odds of a rate hike in 2020.

Most Treasury yields changed little from last week. The 10-year note had the largest yield change, falling 4 bps to 0.69%.

The following numbers are based on Daily Treasury Yield Curve Rates and the CME Group FedWatch.

Treasury Yields (Close of 5/26/20):

  • 1-month: 0.10% same as last week (2.37% a year ago)
  • 3-month: 0.14% up 1 bp from 0.13% last week (2.35% a year ago)
  • 6-month: 0.17% up 2 bps from 0.15% last week (2.39% a year ago)
  • 1-year: 0.17% same as last week (2.33% a year ago)
  • 2--year: 0.18% same as last week (2.16% a year ago)
  • 5--year: 0.35% down 3 bps from 0.38% last week (2.12% a year ago)
  • 10-year: 0.69% down 4 bps from 0.73% last week (2.32% a year ago)
  • 30-year: 1.43% down 1 bp from 1.44% last week (2.75% a year ago)

Fed funds futures' probabilities of future rate changes by:

  • June 2020 - up by at least 25 bps: 0.7% down from 6.4% last week
  • Sep 2020 - up by at least 25 bps: 0.7% down from 6.2% last week
  • Dec 2020 - up by at least 25 bps: 0.7% down from 5.7% last week
  • Mar 2021 - up by at least 25 bps: 0.6% down from 5.5% last week

CD Interest Rate Forecasts

This has been another busy week for CD rate cuts. In March and April, most online banks had been slowly transitioning to lower rates. That changed in May. After a few of the major online banks slashed rates, the other online banks quickly followed, creating an avalanche of cuts.

A small group of rate changes are cuts from banks and credit unions that continue to offer rates above 1.50%. This includes Pen Air Federal Credit Union which lowered its 5-year rate to 1.85% APY. This is the latest institution to lower their 5-year rate below 2.00%.

Unfortunately, the largest group are rate changes from banks and credit unions that lowered CD rates in the range of 1.20% to 1.50%. This group includes major online banks like Ally, Capital One and Synchrony. The group also includes small banks that had been rate leaders, including The Federal Savings Bank and Comenity Direct.

The most disappointing group includes those that have lowered their rates below 1.00%. Andrews Federal Credit Union is in this group. Its CD rates used to be rate leaders. In early March, its 7-year CD had a 3.05% APY. Now, the 7-year CD and all the other CDs have rates that are pathetically low. In the last two weeks, the 7-year CD rate fell from 1.20% to 0.30%, and the 5-year fell from 1.15% to 0.20%.

Once a CD rate falls below 1.00%, I can’t see any benefit over an online savings account. Based on the 2008-2015 zero interest rate period, online savings accounts were always available with rates in the range of 0.70% to 1.00%. If that continues, there’s no benefit of a sub-1.00% CD.

Since there were so many rate cuts in the last week, I’m only listing rate cuts that are most interesting for DA readers. Also, I’m only including one to three CD rate changes per institution to avoid an overload of data. All percentages listed below are APYs.

  • Pen Air FCU (5yr 2.00% → 1.85%, 18m 1.60% → 1.55%)
  • Hiway FCU (5yr 1.75% → 1.60%)
  • First Internet Bank (5yr 1.67% → 1.57%, 1yr 1.31% → 1.29%)
  • WauBank (61m 1.65% → 1.45%, 13m 1.55% → 1.35%)
  • Comenity Direct (5yr 1.65% → 1.45%, 1yr 1.55% → 1.35%)
  • Ally Bank (5yr 1.50% → 1.40%, 1yr 1.35% → 1.30%, 11m NP 1.30% → 1.25%)
  • Synchrony Bank (5yr 1.50% → 1.40%, 1yr 1.35% → 1.00%)
  • The Federal Savings Bank (5yr Promo 2.05% → 5yr Jumbo 1.40%)
  • First National Bank of America (5yr 1.55% → 1.40%, 1yr 1.15% → 1.05%)
  • Capital One (5yr 1.40% → 1.30%, 1yr 1.30% → 1.00%)
  • CIT Bank (5yr 1.40% → 1.30%, 1yr 1.35% → 1.30%, 11m NP 1.30% → 1.20%)
  • Alliant CU (5yr 1.40% → 1.25%, 1yr 1.30% → 1.20%)
  • Popular Direct (5yr 1.30% → 1.20%, 1yr 0.50% → 0.45%)
  • Rising Bank (18m Rising 1.30% → 1.20%, 1yr 1.45% → 1.30%)
  • Andrews FCU (7yr 1.20% → 0.30%, 5yr 1.10% → 0.20%, 1yr 0.50% → 0.05%)

In early May, several major online banks slashed their savings account rates by 20 to 25 bps. There were a few large rate cuts this week. These include HSBC Direct (30 bps cut), Western State Bank (25 bps cut), and WebBank (20 bps cut). Most of the cuts were in the 10 to 15 bps range. Unfortunately, the number of rates above 1.50% are diminishing.

During the zero bound years from 2008 to 2015, most online savings account rates bottomed out in a range from 0.70% to 1.00%. I’m hoping that we won’t see new bottoms from the major online banks. However, based on how their CD rates are falling, I am a little worried.

Below are examples of important savings and money market rate changes in the last week. As is the case with the CD rates, I’ve included only rate changes from the online savings accounts that DA readers would be most interested in. All percentages listed below are APYs.

  • First Foundation Bank Online Savings (1.75% → 1.60%)
  • UFB Direct High Yield Savings (1.61% → 1.51%)
  • BMO Harris Bank Platinum MM (1.65% → 1.50%)
  • Comenity Direct High-Yield Savings (1.55% → 1.45%)
  • All America/Redneck Bank Mega MMA (1.50% → 1.35%)
  • Western State Bank High Yield MM (1.60% → 1.35%)
  • Popular Direct Ultimate Savings (1.50% → 1.35%)
  • Rising Bank High Yield Savings (1.40% → 1.30%)
  • HSBC Direct Savings (1.60% → 1.30%)
  • WauBank High-Yield Savings (1.50% → 1.30%)
  • CIT Bank Money Market (1.40% → 1.30%)
  • CIT Bank Savings Builder (1.30% → 1.25%)
  • BrioDirect High-Yield Savings (1.40% → 1.25%)
  • Discover Online Savings (1.25% → 1.15%)
  • WebBank Savings (1.31% → 1.11%)

I’ll have more discussion of the savings and money market rate changes later tonight in my liquid account rate summary.

Scenario #1: Pandemic wanes and the economy surges back

I’m still keeping this as a possibility. It’s possible that the COVID-19 pandemic turns out to be less of a shock to the economy than current expectations. If that occurs, the U.S. avoids a major recession, and the economy surprises on the upside later this year.

Even if this best-case economic scenario takes place, it seems unlikely rates will rebound quickly. The Fed moved quickly to the zero bound, and it appears prepared to keep it there for many months after the economy recovers. It’s possible that rising inflation could force the Fed to hike rates, but recent history on inflation doesn’t support that. My guess for this best-case scenario is that the Fed goes back to rate hikes in 2023, which is my same prediction from last week.

Scenario #2: Economy falls into a major recession and CD rates remain low for years

The shutdowns are starting to end in many states, and that lowers the odds of this scenario in which the pandemic causes a prolonged and severe recession. However, we are still a long way off from a widespread and full reopening of the economy. Any major resurgence of COVID-19 could derail the recovery.

There’s also the possibility that the pandemic will burst the debt bubble, causing an economic meltdown with a wave of business closures and panic in the financial markets. The Fed has so far been able to keep the financial markets running, and I don’t see a significant risk of an economic meltdown happening in the near term.

If a major recession does occur, the Fed will likely follow a path similar to the one it took after the 2008/2009 recession. It may not take seven years of the zero bound before we see the next Fed rate hike, but in this #2 scenario, it will likely take at least five years for the U.S. economy to recover to the point in which the Fed will start hiking again.

Future Rates and CD Term Decisions

Now that the Fed has returned rates to the zero bound, we can look to the last zero bound years from 2008 to 2015 to help predict what we’ll see in deposit rates. During those years, it did become difficult to find long-term CD rates over 2%, but there were a few rare times when 3% CDs became available. PenFed’s 2013 CDs are an example. I doubt we’ll see any 3% CDs for a while, but that could change in 2021 even if the Fed remains at the zero bound. This would require scenario #1 to occur.

Long-term CDs are making more sense as we appear to be headed back into a long period of very low rates. However, long-term CD rates are no longer attractive. It’s now difficult to find 2% CDs. In fact, many long-term CD rates from the online banks are now under 1.50%. Does a 5-year CD at 1.50% make sense today? It’s hard to say yes to that when there are still many online savings accounts with rates equal to or a little above 1.50%. However, one or two years from now, you may regret keeping too much in a savings account if all savings account rates soon fall below 1.00%.

During the zero bound days from 2008 to 2015, online savings account rates remained in a range of 0.70% to 1.00%. Thus, there was little to gain with CDs that didn’t have yields higher than this. I can’t say for sure if online savings account rates will remain in this range this time. Over the last 20 years, each recession appears to bring with it ever lower deposit rates.

It’s wise to remember that no one can predict future interest rates. So if you want to keep things simple, a CD ladder of long-term CDs is always a useful strategy for your safe money. If you’re worried about the possibility of rising rates, choose long-term CDs with early withdrawal penalties of no more than six months of interest.

Another option for your CD ladder is a ladder of short-term CDs, such as those with 1-year terms. Since many 5-year CDs have equal or lower yields than 1-year CDs, the 5-year CD ladders don’t offer much advantage. Of course, 1-year CD ladders don’t offer the rate lock which may be beneficial if rates keep falling.

CD Rate Trends

The above graph shows the rate trends of the average CD rates. These average rates are based on all the rate data that we have collected over the years. This is an interactive graph. You can choose the term of the CDs (from 3 months to 5 years) and the look-back period (from 3 months to 5 years).

As you can see in the graph, average CD rates for all terms plunged in March and April. The longer-term CDs had the largest rate reduction. The average 5-year CD rate is now below the average rate five years ago before the first Fed rate hike of the last tightening cycle.

Safety of the Banking System and Your Deposits

Even though the banking industry is in a much better position now than it was in 2008, the crisis is stressing the financial system. Weak banks and credit unions will have a higher chance of failing over the next year. Thus, this is the time to be extra careful that your deposits are within the FDIC and NCUA limits.


Comments
gregk
  |     |   Comment #1
Mournful reading.
kcfield
  |     |   Comment #2
During this time of economic uncertainty and historically low interest rates, I believe we need to expand our conception of savings options beyond the usual binary choice of savings or CDs. Certainly, one needs to establish emergency savings (3-6 months of expenses)--with a trustworthy financial institution. Liquidity is essential for emergency savings.
After that, debt reduction and annuities are two other "savings" options to consider. We often forget that paying off a debt, is the equivalent of saving money at the interest rate of the debt. If I make a principal payment of 10k on a 4% mortgage, that is just like earning 4% in savings. Also paying off a mortgage before retirement--or early in retirement can provide financial and emotional relief. Another savings vehicle option is annuities. While annuity rates currently look unattractive (in my inexpert opinion), annuities still provide income stability that may be a worthwhile option for some people. Expanding the conversation about savings beyond savings and CDs--at least until economic uncertainty decreases and interest rates increase--will be of value to many of us. For those who are just interested in savings and CD rates--those charts will always be available on this website.
blazer9
  |     |   Comment #4
ANNUITIES ?
Whose got that much time left?
kcfield
  |     |   Comment #20
Hi Blazer9: Immediate annuities are sometimes a helpful option, even for those of us near or at retirement age, as they can create additional guaranteed income when social security is not enough to cover essential expenses. For example, if a retiree needs 3000.00 a month to pay for food, medical, housing, and utilities, and only gets 2200.00 a month from social security; he/she might purchase an immediate annuity that would bring in the extra 800.00 per month, so that essentials are covered without risk. Once essentials are covered, one can keep some additional money in the market if they wish without losing sleep over market fluctuations.
JimDavis
  |     |   Comment #3
Getting ugly out there, savers are in the crosshairs again

https://www.barrons.com/articles/tiaa-says-negative-yields-could-soon-be-a-possibility-in-money-market-products-51590197564?mod=hp_LATEST
111
  |     |   Comment #9
Although that stinks, it's not quite the same as negative yields on, say, T-bills. The TIAA situation is about yields going low enough that subtracting the fund's money market fee (the annual expense ratio) would result in a negative return for customers - without the fee waiver

I read a few other articles on this, including some Bogleheads posts. It seems that some TIAA MM funds charge annual expense ratios of as much as 30 basis points. I can't figure out why it should cost so much to manage simple MM funds, except of course if there is some extra fat "designed into" the system.
P_D
  |     |   Comment #10
I don't think there is any chance of bank interest rates going negative even if Fed rates go negative (which I doubt they will). If that happened there would be a run on the banks as depositors would demand cash and keep the money under their mattresses. The banking system would collapse.

They have to offer positive rates to the end no matter how thin their profits get in order to continue to attract deposits and avoid bankruptcy. They will attempt to make up the losses they pay depositors with fees and higher loan rates to whatever extent they can.

Low rates are as bad for banks as they are for depositors. Banks are in a lot of pain right now. If the economy doesn't turn around soon it's hard to see how there won't be a lot of bank failures. To hedge that possibility, I chose to move some of my deposits to accounts with sub-optimal rates because they are stronger FIs. A higher rate won't help you if the bank fails and you get a check in the mail after rates dropped to even lower levels.
111
  |     |   Comment #11
"A higher rate won't help you if the bank fails and you get a check in the mail after rates dropped to even lower levels." Agreed. Also, I suppose another factor that must be considered is that from the date the bank fails, the customer gets NO interest, at least until he receives that check and can deposit it somewhere else. Based on what I read about bank failures due to the Great Recession, experts said that depositors under the FDIC limit (now $250K) usually got their checks quickly.

For those with more than $250K, the part over $250K took longer, EVEN WHEN the bank had good records and correct titling of accounts (joint accounts, proper info. on PODs, proper docs. on formal trusts, etc.). In other words, even where the customer and the banks had done everything right, a total above $250K meant extra delay, sometimes a lot. Of course, those with truly uninsured funds were in yet a third category, and often much worse off.
GreenDream
  |     |   Comment #12
Indeed the lowest a bank will go is as close to zero as to be no practical difference. They won't go negative because they need deposits in order to make loans (and loans won't go negative because banks aren't going to pay you to take their money, that won't happen).

In Japan and Europe, where negative central bank rates (our fed fund rate equivalent) have been in operation for years now, depositors haven't had negative rates though they haven't had positive rates either. (though there has been talk of charging larger depositors, IE 'the rich", a fee for holding the money).

People need to remember what the rate that would be negative really is. It's the rate the central bank (the Fed in the US) applies to the funds other banks hold at the central bank, it's **NOT** the rate that banks issue depositors or charge borrowers. Which is why, even though the Fed has been at *ZERO* for a couple months now, you can still easily get savings accounts that have rates above 1%. (this really shouldn't have to be told to people here at DA, as we can easily see what the rates are for hundreds of banks and credit unions with just a few clicks of the mouse) I mean, if you have a 1.5% rate at an online bank today, do your really think they'll drop their rates to below zero if, as unlikely as it is currently, the Fed were cut it's rate to -0.25% (a drop of a mere 25 basis points)? Not going to happen, even B&M banks that charge next to nothing wouldn't drop below zero, they'd just continue offering 0.01% to 0.10% rates while making borrowers pay 2.00%+ rates.
blazer9
  |     |   Comment #13
P_D # 10
Would you comment on this ? as it pertains to stronger FIs


Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis President Neel Kashkari says that large U.S. banks should raise $200 billion from private investors and stop paying dividends so they can support the economy.

“The most patriotic thing they could do today would be to stop paying dividends and raise equity capital, to ensure that they can endure a deep economic downturn,” Kashkari writes in a Financial Times op-ed.
P_D
  |     |   Comment #14
"P_D # 10
Would you comment on this ? as it pertains to stronger FIs"

Sure. Banks aren't in business to be patriotic, they are in business to maximize returns for their shareholders like every other business. Their management has a fiduciary duty to adhere to that mission. Leave the patriotism to other entities whose mission it is to be patriotic.
blazer9
  |     |   Comment #15
Was hoping to get a opinion more centered on the FED, and banking
seeing as how they are paddling the boat.
Thank You
P_D
  |     |   Comment #17
#15
Sorry to disappoint. You seem to both ask and answer your own question so maybe my response is superfluous. But in an attempt to answer along the angle you are seeking here is what I would say:

I think that Kashkari's comment is absurd. If banks stop paying dividends their share prices will fall and they will lose investors. That will raise their cost of capital at the very time they need that capital the most and their profits are being squeezed. That will make banks weaker not stronger.

If the goal is to cause an increase in bank failure it might sense, otherwise it's ridiculous.

Kashkari is a member of the Fed. What he is suggesting is exactly the opposite of the best interest of banks. So I think his comment that you quoted demonstrates the opposite of the argument (I think) you are making. His comment shows that at least one member of the Fed is biased AGAINST the banks, not for them.
blazer9
  |     |   Comment #29
"I chose to move some of my deposits to accounts with sub-optimal rates because they are stronger FIs"

Most likely I know not what I was asking for.
So if Kashkari said make banks stop Dividends ( I took that mean interest ) How that would effect your decision. But Dividends are for the stock guys and Bank profits. So I get it now,TY
milty
  |     |   Comment #30
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/harold-meyerson-the-myth-of-maximizing-shareholder-value/2014/02/11/00cdfb14-9336-11e3-84e1-27626c5ef5fb_story.html

Since you said management has a "fiduciary duty," which is a legal term, perhaps you can quote the law that states management must maximize shareholder profits (even if it's not in the best interest of the company).

As a side note, sadly most financial advisors still have no fiduciary duty to act in the best interest of their clients. Always a good idea to ask your "advisor" if they are acting as a fiduciary when asking for financial advice.
#5 - This comment has been removed for violating our comment policy.
#19 - This comment has been removed for violating our comment policy.
Federal Reserve, the Economy and CD Rate Forecast - May 19, 2020

On Sunday, 60 Minutes aired an interview with Fed Chair Jerome Powell that took place last Wednesday. Overall, the Fed Chair remained optimistic for the medium and long run view of the economy. As he said in the interview, there remains a lot of uncertainty in the short run:

A lot of the uncertainty comes from how American’s confidence will evolve. If people don’t feel safe and don’t participate in the economy like they used to, major parts of the economy will suffer (such as travel, concerts, sporting events, etc.) This...

Continue Reading
Federal Reserve, the Economy and CD Rate Forecast - May 12, 2020

The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) released the April inflation report this morning. Inflation as measured by CPI declined 0.8% in April. According to the BLS, this was “the largest monthly decline since December 2008.” A few components of the CPI didn’t decline. The “index for food at home” had its largest monthly increase since February 1974. The high demand for groceries and the meat supply issues probably drove this increase. More important for the Fed is the Core CPI that excludes volatile food and energy. Core CPI had...

Continue Reading
Federal Reserve, the Economy and CD Rate Forecast - May 5, 2020

No new policies were announced at last week’s Fed meeting. That was expected since the Fed had already enacted many aggressive new policies in March as the economy was shut down to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. The Fed meeting and the post-meeting press briefing did reinforce the likelihood of a long downturn and it reinforced the Fed’s commitment to maintain the aggressive policies (including near zero rates) until an economic recovery is well underway. This can be seen in the following excerpt of the FOMC statement:

For savers this may mean...

Continue Reading
Federal Reserve, the Economy and CD Rate Forecast - April 28, 2020

The scheduled Fed meeting is taking place today and Wednesday. No new policy actions are expected to be announced when the meeting ends on Wednesday. The FOMC announcement is scheduled for 2:00 pm Wednesday followed by a press briefing by Fed Chair Jerome Powell.

Last week, former Minneapolis Fed president, Narayana Kocherlakota, advocated in this Bloomberg opinion piece that the Fed should take rates negative at this week’s meeting. Kocherlakota summarized why he felt the Fed should go negative by saying:

Fortunately, the expectations are very low for the Fed to...

Continue Reading
Federal Reserve, the Economy and CD Rate Forecast - April 21, 2020

The next scheduled FOMC meeting will take place next week (April 28-29) unless it’s preempted by another emergency meeting. I don’t think anyone expects another emergency meeting before April 28th, but as we learned last month, the Fed can surprise us as it tries to keep the economy running. It was a Sunday emergency meeting on March 15th that the Fed slashed the target federal funds rate to near zero. That was unexpected since a regularly scheduled meeting was to take place that week.

It is possible that something could prompt...

Continue Reading

More Past Offers