Book Review: The Creature from Jekyll Island
With all the talk of Operation Twist, and the possibility of QE3, and the power of the Federal Reserve, it seems an ideal time to examine the Federal Reserve System, which was established as the ce Federal Reserve Act in 1913. However, according to a rather large and exhaustive book documenting the Federal Reserve, by G. Edward Griffin, the Fed was conceived during a secret meeting on Jekyll Island. Griffin charts the development of the Federal Reserve, and its effect on the economy, in the book The Creature from Jekyll Island.
Griffin starts this carefully researched and sourced book with the story of a secret meeting that took place in 1910 on Jekyll Island, off the coast of Georgia. In attendance were six men who represented, according to the calculations in the book, one-fourth of the world's wealth at the time. Men associated with, and representing, interests of the Rockefellers, Morgans, Rothschilds and Warburgs met with Republican Senator Nelson W. Aldrich to figure out a way to allow them grow their interests, and to shift the national banking system from one of thrift to one of debt. What they came up with was the Federal Reserve.
In order to organize the story of the Federal Reserve and its effects on the economy in a way that takes the reader on a journey and provides insightful information, Griffin has grouped 26 chapters into six sections. He also includes an appendix with parts. The book is not presented strictly chronologically, but addresses different, related concepts that illustrate the power and effects of the Federal Reserve. Two of the most interesting sections are II and III. Section II presents "A Crash Course On Money" and takes a look at the monetary system, gold based currency and fiat currency, and how it all works together. Section III addresses the "alchemy" of transforming the "lead bullets of war" into an "endless source of gold." Griffin asserts that modern wars have been largely possible by fiat currency, and the Federal Reserve has been central in this effort.
Griffin explains and acknowledges the arguments in favor of the Federal Reserve System, and then refutes them. He looks at the history of bailouts, and the fact that major banks want anything but competition -- and he exposes the cartel nature of the Federal Reserve System as it was conceived by wealthy and powerful men more than a century ago. It seems amazing, when reading this book, that the Fed has survived when America's previous attempts at a central bank failed miserably. It's a fascinating journey into the past, and one that provides a great deal of insight -- whether or not you agree with Griffin that the Federal Reserve ought to be ended.
The Creature from Jekyll Island ends with a look at the possibilities for the future. Griffin presents a pessimistic view, of America's transition to becoming part of a world government of superstates, and takes a look at the possibility of coming hyperinflation. After scaring you with this outlook, he completes the book with "A Realistic Scenario." This chapter lays out a plan for getting rid of the Federal Reserve and bringing our "monetary binge" under control as a nation. But, it won't be easy:
"There is no optimistic scenario. Events have progressed too far for that. Even if we begin to turn things around by forcing Congress to cut spending, reduce the debt, and disentangle from UN treaties, the Cabal will not let go without a ferocious fight. When the Second Bank of the United States was struggling for its life in 1834, Nicholas Biddle, who controlled it, set about to cause as much havoc in the economy as possible...By suddenly tightening credit and withdrawing money from circulation, he triggered a full-scale national depression...The amount of devastation that could be caused by today's Federal Reserve is infinitely greater than what Biddle was able to unleash." (pp.565-66)
Throughout the book, Griffin offers specific reasons for why he thinks the Fed should be abolished. He uses painstaking evidence and research to back up his claims, and finishes up with a plan for getting rid of the Fed -- and its economic controls -- and reverting back to an economy better based in free market principles. His 16-point plan includes defining a "real" dollar in terms of precious-metal content (Griffin prefers silver), retiring Federal Reserve notes and severely reducing the size of government.
While the plan is compelling, I'm not sure how realistic it actually is. It's well and good to talk about retiring federal reserve notes and restoring free coinage, but, really, our monetary system has moved so far beyond basing money in "real" and tangible assets. So much of our money is digital now. Griffin mentions issuing Treasury Certificates 100% backed by hard assets to become the new paper currency, but how many people even use paper currency? So much of the wealth that we have is represented in digital terms, without paper -- much less gold or silver -- changing hands. Griffin mentions electronic transfer systems, and the difficulty of switching to a new monetary system, but doesn't go into great detail about what happens to those who are almost completely digital in their financial transactions, and whose wealth is expressed in digital terms. More details about this part of the transition would definitely be of interest.
Finally, Griffin offers some very sensible advice for preparing for the future -- no matter what the future holds. Getting out of debt, diversifying investments, keeping a cash stash (including old silver coins), and stockpiling food and water to prepare for a worst-case scenario of interrupted delivery systems, are all suggestions that many of us can benefit from.
Overall, The Creature from Jekyll Island is an interesting and insightful book, with the positions of the author backed by careful research and meticulously sourced. Even for those who may not agree with everything the author sets forth, the book offers an interesting journey through modern monetary history.
Please log in to comment on this post.
why, because it creates conflict of interest.
The FEDs computer models are set up to include 3% perpetual inflation, so when deflation shows up on the horizon, Bernanke went ballistic and started to print money by tone loads.
It is not what we think the FEDs will do, but what they do is what it counts.
We think that price stability and employments are part of the FEDs job, it is not. FEDs only concern is how to make more money by superimposing their view as the only true reflection of the monetary system, money supply and loan manipulations. In other wards, they control our state of mind by telling us whether there is inflation or not or whatever the value of the Dollar will be. This way, they indirectly control the stock markets around the globe, the value of the exchange rates, money supply and try to always be profitable in their spread sheets.
Why do you think Geithner is in Europe now, Bernanke sent him as deal maker to implement the FEDs idea that the Dollar must be included in the banks bail out in Europe, so they will control the big banks over there too. Why do you think Bernanke gave secret loans to Deutsche Bank, UBS, Society General and others, simple answer, global control of the financial system.
So, as most of you may think differently of what is the purpose of the FEDs, well, it is not what most of us are thought to think, we are brain washed and bombarded with trivial solutions and ideas, but the real truth is that the FEDs are controlling most of our lives indirectly, from salary we get, interest we earn or pay, undisclosed inflation that is eroding our savings and future of our economic state. Anything else is not part of the FEDs mandate, even when they have those secret meeting to show concerns about the economy, it is not to help us, but to help FEDs only to balance their general ledger entries.
If the FEDs can be dismantled, then the true market economy can take effect, until then , we all live in a controlled environment with false hope of better times ahead.
You wrote:
“...Inflation only occurs when there is excess credit which is VERBOTEN in section 2a of the federal reserve act.....”
If that is true, then the housing bubble would have been prevented, since even my cat qualified for credit from the bank to buy a property with stated income only and free credit offers were at every bank’s window, like no money down no interest for 5 years, no income verification, everyone qualifies.
I used to receive free credit cards, unsolicited by me or ever applied for it, credit was given to anyone just for asking from 2000-2006, if that was not excess then what is?
How do you define excess?
Why inflation did not occur?
I still think the FED mandate is not to protect you from excess credit or inflation since excess credit is what the FED wants. Look at the order to the banks to keep the interest rate low, no matter what the consequences will be in future.
Every time you post, you contradict yourself. Either you are misinterpreting the statutes you read from or you are trying to portrait yourself as knowledgeable person on the workouts of the FED.
They do not care for any of us and our labor is not guaranty for future payments of any kind.
That is what the FEDs are trying to make you believe, since their computer entry field must be pledged to something (like future income) to stay in balance.
If our labor is pledged as income to the FEDs, then everybody should pay tax on all incomes, including the 40% that don’t pay any income tax at all and another 20% that are exempt from any income tax, like for: not for profit organizations, religious groups. disabled, people on entitlements from cradle to grave and so on. That is more then one half of USA population not pledged for present and future incomes from the definition you presented.
Since the labor is a variable entry point, it will create havoc in the FEDs balance sheet.
I have never ever heard a FED person to say US labor force is our future guaranty for income and balanced economy, but, I hear it from the members of Congress almost daily.
The income tax does not goes to the FEDs, it is used to pay the interest on the national debt and to the military and rest to Federal employees and entitlements and to grants and foreign aid and all of the pork belly projects and wasteful programs.
All of our future is being gambled and made almost impossible to predict with the current $1.3 Trillions yearly deficits. The FEDs created and unimaginable debt liability on all of us by buying or lending to the US treasury to cover the shortfalls in the budget.
I don't need to read any of the "9-11 truth" books or "Barack Obama is a secret Kenyan" books to know they are conspiracy books. Any book that says the Federal Reserve was created by a secret cabal of wealthy men to line their own pockets is crap. The fact that it was touted by a borderline crazy man making money off his sucker listeners (Goldline, anyone?) only reinforces that.
Also, in case you didn't notice, I responded to a book review - assuming Miranda did a decent job in summarizing it, I shouldn't need to read the book to comprehend its arguments.
Please explain the secret deals Bernanke did with the Europian banks and please explain why the Congress wants to make Bernanke open the books for review if there are no secret deals made by the FED.
Please explain why Bernanke gave secret loans with undisclosed amounts to many US banks and brokerage firms. Who benefited with those loans and how much?
If you can not answer the above for certainty, you can not remove the secrecy that enshrouds the FED.
I do not like the decisions the Federal Reserve is making for our financial survival and at such a cost to the savers of this country. How I hope that book is a "farce" but the actions being taken by those in charge at the Federal Reserve give me great fear that it may have been a warning too many of us prefere to ignore. It is affecting our lives and what savings we have skrimped to save over the years for our elderly years. If it is allowed to continue, I fear much worse is to come for our nation. I don't belong to "any" conspiracy group but it seems my deceased friend was right to a "T"! May he rest in peace.