For the economic gurus out there in DA land, I have a question regarding calculation of net worth, specifically as regards to IRAs and 401Ks.
Background: As we all know, popularly-available net worth calculators always require you to subtract "debt" from "assets" to calculate net worth.
Query: Is a prospective tax liability on a tax-deferred account correctly noted as a "debt" when calculating net worth?
Analysis: The handy-dandy net worth calculator I use (at Alliant Credit Union's website) does not automatically characterize future tax liabilities as "debt". Indeed, after-tax assets and tax-deferred assets are all lumped together.
Problem: As any retiree will be quick to note, an after-tax asset is worth more, dollar-for-dollar, than a tax-deferred asset. Reason being: taxes (duh). Tax-deferred assets get nailed with ordinary income taxes (state and federal) on withdrawal. After-tax assets are subject only to capital gains tax. Ignore California for the moment.
What's the Point?: Quite simple. A dollar in a tax-deferred account (whether IRA or 401K) is, by definition, worth less when calculating "net worth" than a dollar in an after-tax account. Think of a future tax liability as a "debt".
Example: Joe and Jane have $1,000,000 in their combined IRA/401K accounts. They have little else to speak of in terms of assets. What is their net worth? See the issue?