Is Anyone Seeing Tenants, Debtors, Etc. Being Excused From Performance B/C Of Coronaviruus?

Choice
  |     |   937 posts since 2020

I saw a letter to editor that California tenants, landlord’s loans, etc may be excused under state law as being a force majeure event.  California civil code §1511 was cited as an example...one can google it. Is anyone seeing something like that in there location or situation? Disclaimer: No legal advice offered here..see your own adviser



Answers
me1004
  |     |   1,379 posts since 2010
Don't know about Calif. law including any forced majeure protection (meaning for an unavoidable natural catastrophe such as the pendemic). However, there are various such protections that have been ordered nationally, statewide andlocally due to the pandemic.

I'm pretty sure foreclosures due to non-payment linked to the pandemic have been banned nationally. I know many localities around California have banned evictions for non-payment of rent if the tenant has lost their job or income due to the pandemic, and the state Judicial Council has ordered the entire California court system to stop holding hearings on evictions (the Judicial Council currently is considering whether to lift that hold on eviction cases in the next few weeks). Landlords are being provided tax benefits to help them. Mind you, the ban on evictions for non-payment due to the pandemic does not forgive the money owed, it simply delays the necessity to pay it now. All the orders state a time period by which the money will have to be paid anyway, which has raised fear of mass evictions once that deadline to pay arrives. And that in a state that has far and away more homeless people than any other state. Los Angeles has triple the number of homeless people all over everywhere as the next highest locality in the country. Los Angeles County has around 60,000 homeless people even before the pandemic hit.

But specific to that statute, reading it, it does seem to do the same as these emergency orders are doing:
1511: The want of performance of an obligation, or of an offer of performance, in whole or in part, or any delay therein, is excused by the following causes, to the extent to which they operate: ...

2. When it is prevented or delayed by an irresistible, superhuman cause, ... unless the parties have expressly agreed to the contrary; ...
That sounds to me like it can protect the debtor -- unless they have agreed to the contrary, as in a lease or other agreement. That "agreement" could leave many people unprotected. But I believe these emergency orders are overriding any such lease or other agreement.
Choice
  |     |   937 posts since 2020
Could FIs be next to assert FM and reduce %rates on existing CDs (even those not expressly callable) if not enough customers don’t voluntarily cash out on penalty free basis their higher rate CDs. Non-IRA CDs would be a good target! And NCUA would...standby customer/CU?


The financial institution, product, and APY (Annual Percentage Yield) data displayed on this website is gathered from various sources and may not reflect all of the offers available in your region. Although we strive to provide the most accurate data possible, we cannot guarantee its accuracy. The content displayed is for general information purposes only; always verify account details and availability with the financial institution before opening an account. Contact [email protected] to report inaccurate info or to request offers be included in this website. We are not affiliated with the financial institutions included in this website.